Author Archive for admin



Poles apart but together in science for International Polar Year

18 April 2007
11:00 amto12:30 pm
icon for podpress  Poles apart: International Polar Year [90:37m]: Download

PRODUCER: Peter Calamai, Sandra Zicus,

CHAIR: Veronika Meduna

SPEAKERS: Louis Fortier, Kathy Conlan, David Hik, Steve Rintoul, Patti Virtue, Michael Stoddard

SESSION REPORT: Now is not the time for complanency

By Julia Hind

Our planet is changing, a leading Arctic scientist warned this week.

Speaking at the Wednesday morning session, Louis Fortier, Professor at the Université Laval in Canada, called for governments to have the political will to cut carbon dioxide emissions.

“If we don’t do anything now, this trend could be catastrophic,” he said.

Professor Fortier described some of the changes already observed in the Arctic including the reduction of summer ice cover. He said there has been a 30 per cent drop in summer Arctic ice cover in the past 30 years, with the greatest changes observed since the 1990s. He added that the evidence suggests the rate of melt was accelerating.

“Things are changing. There is an assault on the ice from the atmosphere but also from an increase influx of water from the Atlantic Ocean into the Arctic Ocean”. He believes predictions that the Arctic could be free of ice in the summer by 2015 were a possibility. This in turn, he said, would have enormous effects on animals and people, as well as raising major geopolitical questions.

But it is not just in the Arctic where the effects of climate change are becoming apparent. The meeting also heard from Stephen Rintoul, a scientist with CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, who described the crucial role played by the Southern Ocean in transporting heat around the globe and in absorbing carbon dioxide.

He said studies show the Southern Ocean is also changing with water at the bottom less saline and less dense than 30 years ago. This change in salinity and density could affect the water’s ability to sink and subsequently slow the ocean circulation.

The recently launched International Polar Year will give scientists an opportunity to study the Southern Ocean in a way they have not before. Scientists from 18 nations are taking part in a project to observe the ocean simultaneously from different locations, as well as in the winter and from under the ice.

Reporting climate change

icon for podpress  Reporting climate change [77:25m]: Download

PRODUCER: Simon Torok

CHAIR: Wilson da Silva

SPEAKERS: Kevin Hennessy, Geoff Love, Ian Lowe

PANEL: Chris Mooney, Simon Torok

SESSION REPORT: Climate Change in Ocean and how the media balance the reporting

By Xuxiuhua (from www.people.com.cn,China)

Climate change is now a hot topic to governments and scientists in developed and developing countries.

But it seems we pay too much attention to the land and not enough attention to the ocean.

At this session, Steve Rintoul, a scientist from CSIRO Marine & Southern Ocean Studies, says that since 1955, 84 percent of “global warming” is found in the ocean. So it stands to reason that the ocean, especially the ocean in polar regions, plays a critical role in climate change.

Polar regions can regulate the amount of CO2 — the main greenhouse gas which can cause global warming — being absorbed by the oceans. And new evidence shows that ice sheets are more dynamic than we thought before. Analysis of satellite data and tide-gauge observation indicates that the rate of sea-level rise has been increasing.

However there is another opinion. Some scientists consider that if you study the history of climate change criteria, the climate change we are enduring now is normal. The question is should the media present both sides of the argument to the public?

2nd SESSION REPORT: REPORTING CLIMATE CHANGE: THE DEVELOPING WORLD PERSPECTIVE

Presentation by Ochieng’ Ogodo

No doubt, communities need information on climate change. Good reporting on climate change is becoming increasingly important, especially for the developing world that has fragile economies and the vulnerable poor.

More and more, our lives are getting affected by the ever changing and unpredictable weather conditions. The developing world need to think about climate change, consider its impact on the environment, and deal with the problem. The community needs well informed science journalists who can report accurately and impartially on the impact of science on the society and across the world yet the subject is hardly covered by media in the South.

Throughout the 1990s, the media in the developing world was at the forefront of reporting on the devastation brought by the ‘El Niño’ rains, and bringing the issue of global climate change - and its impact on the local economy - into sharp focus.

The extensive coverage provided farmers and rural communities with a scientific explanation for the dramatic weather changes that they had been witnessing in recent years.

But while such high-profile occurrences captured the public imagination and generated intense debates on the impacts of environmental degradation on people’s day-to-day lives, the momentum generated was not sustained.

The topic of climate change that has captured the attention of the world for almost a decade 2000s, especially the developed nations, though they are culpable as major contributors to global warming, is not getting adequate attention in the media in the south.

The media has continued to focus on the ‘big’ stories such as deaths from drought, or the destruction caused by floods, with little information being provided on how to cope with the effects of climate-related changes.

Climate change is a relatively new concept within African media. Few journalists - or even editors, who are the gatekeepers of stories that go on air or into print - have a clear grasp of the science behind this phenomenon. On many occasions, science-oriented stories, as well as those covering forestry, agriculture, and climate change, get ‘spiked’. Publishers prefer stories about crime, violence and political scandal because this is what ‘sells.’

Yet above all, what farmers and rural communities require for mitigating and adapting to the effects of climate change, is access to information.

Farmers need to know whether the changing circumstances in which they grow their plants or raise their animals is merely a question of variability or a permanent change to weather patterns. Communities across the south also need channels through which they can share information on strategies that have worked well for them, and to adapt such techniques to their own circumstances, whenever possible.

Beyond sharing practical experiences, civil society organizations in the South need to discuss how best to exploit international support available through such instruments as the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), while continuing to debate amongst ourselves whether these approaches to emissions reductions are in their best interest.

The media - television, radio, print and online - naturally have a vital role to play in such debates, and yet there is a dearth of coverage of science issues in the developing world. A recent survey by the London-based NGO, Panos, of 47 journalists and from Jamaica, Zambia, Honduras and Sri Lanka found considerable frustration amongst media professionals, with what they felt was a severe lack of interest by editors.

Media owners are often concerned about short-term profits and may be unwilling to criticize industry, or offend advertisers. As many of the media houses operate on shoestring budgets, they often do not have adequate resources to undertake thorough investigation of climate-related stories.

Illiteracy too can be an obstacle to awareness, although the creation of online image banks of photographs and diagrams could help to convey the impacts of various facets of science.

There is also a need to build bridges between scientists and journalists. Scientists are often unwilling to simplify their research findings for a lay audience, so journalists have to sharpen their skills to simplify jargon heavy scientific content and make the subject more relevant and easier to understand.

We journalists too can do much to help ourselves. We can set up networks in order to share information. The Caribbean Environmental Reporters Network (CERN) and the Kenya Environment and Science Journalists Association (KENSJA) are good examples.

We also need to build bridges between the developed and developing environmental and science journalists so that we can exchange ideas and information.

Lack of pulling together-everyone with a stake in this problem - journalists, editors and publishers, NGOs, policy makers and funders, and of course the people of the developing world – are not pulling together to fill this grievous information gap. We need to do that.

Purifying a Poisoned Planet

17 April 2007
4:00 pmto5:30 pm
icon for podpress  Purifying a Poisoned Planet [79:00m]: Download

PRODUCER: Julian Cribb

CHAIR: Brad Collis

SPEAKERS: Jack Ng, Ravi Naidu, Stevan Green

SESSION REPORT: This way to “zero waste”

By Christine Dell ‘Amore

The cocktail of chemicals that are the byproducts of a modernizing world pose an increasing public health burden to people.

Exposure to environmental contaminants such as arsenic, mercury and persistent organic pollutants (POPs), cause a range of health problems, from diabetes to cancer, while degrading Earth’s sensitive ecosystems. There are about 10 million contaminated sites around the world and 100,000 in Australia.

Tackling the problem means first determining a “dose-response”– or how much exposure to a chemical causes an effect, said Jack Ng of the Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) for Contamination, Assessment and Remediation of the Environment in Queensland. He was speaking at World Conference of Science Journalists briefing in Melbourne.

The CRC is developing a rapid response biological or chemical test to assess risk to potentially harmful exposure, which can be used real-time in the field.

“This represents a huge opportunity (for an organization such as ours) to develop methodologies to not only better quantify the risk but to remediate — to turn a waste site into a useful site,” Ng said.

For instance, many waste sites can be cleaned up and restored to residential neighborhoods or parkland. In Australia, the responsibility of clean-up is not mandated by government legislation, as in the United States, said Ng, and companies mostly fund clean-up efforts.

Remediation can also be approached through a sustainable prism, for example by reducing industry’s reliance on carbon dioxide, said Stevan Green, CEO of the CRC for Sustainable Resource Processing.

The polluted “red mud” from bauxite mining, for instance, can be neutralized by carbon dioxide from fertilizer. The carbon dioxide, a potent greenhouse gas, is then trapped in the less-toxic mud — a win-win situation, said Green.

Still, to really discern the interactions and health impacts of just 25 chemicals, 33 million experiments at $100,000 each would cost 3 trillion dollars — a staggering challenge for toxicologists, Ng said.

The Role of Scientific Journals in Breaking News

17 April 2007
4:00 pmto5:30 pm
icon for podpress  The Role of Scientific Journals in Breaking News [89:43m]: Download

PRODUCER: Veronique Morin, Alana Mitchell

CHAIR: Kathryn O’Hara

SPEAKERS: Pallab Ghosh, Phil Campbell, Geoff McFadden, Leigh Dayton

SESSION REPORT: Embargoed “till when?”

By Brendan Borrell

“The relationship between [science journalists] and the journals defines the way the rest of the world views science,” said Pallab Ghosh from the BBC.

He criticized journalists who pay undue reverence to scientific journals and let themselves be “spoon-fed readymade copy,” provided by the journal press releases.

He felt that the embargo system used by high profile journals like Science and Nature made journalists lazy and allowed a few powerful journals to dominate the media.

Ghosh directed several good-natured barbs towards fellow panelist Phil Campbell, editor-in-chief at Nature, who took the podium next to defend embargoes.

Campbell explained that Nature’s policy doesn’t prevent scientists from discussing their findings at conferences or posting papers on preprint servers, and journalists are free to report “process” stories. However, if the coverage is focused on an upcoming article then scientists must limit their conversations to journalists who will respect the embargo.

He said that recent criticisms of the embargo system really reflect problems in the newsroom; if anything, the embargo system helps more science get into newspapers.

Panelist Leigh Dayton of The Australian agreed: “If I say this journal Nature has a fascinating story on life on Mars, Venus, Mercury . . . then I have chance of getting a few paragraphs in the back of the paper.”

Perhaps the most insightful perspective came from the only scientist on the panel, Geoff McFadden of the University of Melbourne. McFadden studies malaria and described the “bizarre experience” of being bombarded with interviews in the days leading up to its publication in Nature in 1996. “Two days later, the story was done,” he said.

Research that had been completed over the course of two years was in and out of the headlines in a matter of days. That’s news.

Wise up - The truth about TV science

17 April 2007
2:00 pmto3:30 pm
icon for podpress  Wise up - The truth about TV science [85:35m]: Download

PRODUCER: Sonya Pemberton

CHAIR: Graham Phillips

SPEAKERS: Peter Rees, Catherine Marciniak, Nalaka Gunawardene, Sonya Pemberton

SESSION REPORT: Lights, Camera, Explosion!

By Daniela Abusqueda

“Are TV science shows really science journalism?” asked Graham Phillips, chair of this session.

Peter Rees, the creator of the famous TV show “Mythbusters”, said the show’s success lies in the fact that it never mentions the word “science”, although it contains a lot of it. He said the BBC considers the show a science program and added that every experiment in the show is based on peer-reviewed articles.

Catherine Marciniak, producer of “Life at 1”, explains how her show chose 11 children and their families who agreed to let the cameras enter in their houses for seven years “to put their life under the microscope.” She defined the program as an observational documentary that mixes interviews and experiments, and includes stories where science comes before talent.

Sonya Pemberton, executive producer of a new show called “Crude” that will be on air on May 24th, presented parts of the new program. The documentary includes digital reconstruction of ancient environments, extinct species and images of the modern world while a voice tells the story of oil and the carbon circle.

She said that the show’s main character is the carbon molecule and it targets people who want to understand global warming and the green house effect.

Finally, Nalaka Gunawardene, producer of TVE Asia Pacific from Sri Lanka, explained how the broadcasting model is different in developing countries. Now the challenge is to pack science, not in a lineal format — like the traditional documentary style — but in a way that can attract people under 30 — the digital natives — he called them.

A Peer Review of Peer Review

17 April 2007
2:00 pmto3:30 pm
icon for podpress  A peer review of peer review [85:35m]: Download

PRODUCER: Julie Egan

CHAIR: Jim Handman

SPEAKERS: Phil Campbell, Warwick Anderson, John Rennie

PANELLIST: Carol Nader

SESSION REPORT: Ask, then ask again

By Robert Frederick

“Who here, by show of hands, does not trust peer review?” John Rennie, editor in chief of Scientific American, asked that question of a hundred delegates in this session. No one raised a hand, but more than a few hands fluttered in uncertainty.

Peer review is the process though which editors screen papers and granting agencies select projects. Typically, this process involves getting several experts to evaluate the author’s work or proposal. But the process relies on trust and the author’s honesty, and many publications have been hoodwinked.

“Peer review definitely enhances the reliability of what appears, at least in the journals that I’m familiar with,” said Philip Campbell, Nature’s editor in chief. But “anything you see [in any journal]… is provisional.”

Warwick Anderson, former research scientists and current CEO of Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council, echoed that sentiment. “I think [peer review] just shows all the normal failings of something that involves human beings.”

While extolled as the gold standard, speakers at the A peer review of peer review session also lambasted peer review as a gauntlet for researchers, a burden for scientists, and a crutch for journalists. But whether an article had been peer reviewed before publication, each speaker said true peer review begins with publication. That’s when other scientists repeat the experiment or attempt to build on the result.

Speaking after the session, delegate and AAAS’s Senior Communications Officer Earl Lane said journalists should view journal articles and his organization’s EurekAlert! service as “A starting point for a story. I don’t think we would portray it as anything more than that.”

In summarizing advice to journalists, panelist Jim Handman, CBC’s senior producer of Quirks and Quarks, said even after a work has been peer reviewed, journalists should keep asking that all-important question, ‘How do they know that?’

Investigating Scientific Fraud

17 April 2007
11:00 amto12:30 pm
icon for podpress  Investigating scientific fraud [93:33m]: Download

PRODUCER: Elizabeth Finkel

CHAIR: Norman Swan

PANEL: Kim Hee Won, Jia Hepeng, Warwick Anderson, Phil Campbell, Phil Vardy

SESSION REPORT: Exposing the ugly

By Karen Dente

Ever since last year’s scandal surrounding Korea’s cloning researcher Hwang Woo Suk gained worldwide media attention, the issue of scientific fraud exposure seems to have taken on some momentum of its own.

Australia is not proud to have a history riddled with scientists tampering with their data to further their careers.

One such example was the famous McBride case that was uncovered in the eighties by investigative journalist Normal Swan, who vows never to pursue another case of scientific fraud. Dr. William McBride achieved notoriety in the 1960s by pointing out the link between pregnant women taking the drug thalidomide and limb deformities in their children.

Biologist Phil Vardy, who unearthed the manipulated data after “receiving the bullet” by Swan and who was working at the Foundation 41 Birth Defects Research Institute in Sydney headed by McBride, gave three points of warning to whistleblowers when pursuing a case of fraud.

He emphasized the importance of securing primary evidence, of confronting the fraudster before he should have time to mount a defense, and to focus on a few points only. He believes not confronting a fraudster when sure of having a case to be worst fraud of all.

When dealing with scientific fraud “we need much tougher laws” said Professor Warwick Anderson, who heads the National Health and Medical Research Council in Australia. He is currently actively involved in trying to bring scientific fraud under the criminal code, a task that is being complicated by regulations under the Australian Constitution. Fortunately, many institutes in Australia and elsewhere around the globe now have whistleblower laws to deal directly with fraud when it emerges, he explained.

“In China, research institutions are less likely to confront fraud by their scientists,” explained Jia Hepeng, panelist and Chinese freelance journalist who writes for Science. This leaves all the more responsibility for the uncovering of fraud to the journalists, a role he seems content to fill.

New Media: podcasting, Second Life and the future of the Web

17 April 2007
11:00 amto12:30 pm

PRODUCER:  Abbie Thomas

CHAIR:  Bernie Hobbs

SPEAKERS:  Ian Allan, Abigail E. Thomas, Chris Smith, James Massola

SESSION REPORT: Podcasting: Radio on the Web
By John Bohannon
The fact that the room was fully packed for this session reveals the keen interest among journalists to explore the virtual world. Ian Allan gave an overview of ABC’s online venture, which was launched in 1997 and has evolved into the wildly popular Website called The Lab. One of the moments in ABC’s online history that most moved Allan was after the 9-11 attacks in 2001. Volunteer engineers, firemen, and other experts who gathered spontaneously on their online forum, called Self-Service Science, worked out the reasons for the World Trade Center towers’ accordian-like collapse weeks before it emerged in the mainstream media.

He holds this up as an example of how creating spaces for discussion can generate valuable content, but only so long as the participants come with a spirit of good will.

Abigail Thomas took us on a tour of the strange new world known as Second Life, a massive online community who inhabit — and continually create — a 3-dimensional world. It ain’t just for geeks. NASA has set up shop in Second Life, building virtual museums, staging educational events, and even providing a replica of the surface of Mars based on data coming in from the probes.

Other “islands” have been created by NOAA, the Centre for Water Studies, as well as the ABC. Thomas, a.k.a. Abi Goldflake, encouraged us to visit Second Life, create “avatars” and explore the world for ourselves.

To everyone’s dismay, Chris Smith was not naked as advertised. But his account of how a weekly science podcast known as The Naked Scientists has skyrocketed to the top of the iTunes download charts was inspiring. The show’s website now has some 6 million visitors a week and the podcast is downloaded by 60,000 people weekly. One wonders how he has time for his dayjob: virology research at the University of Cambridge.

Insisting that he is not in fact an ex-Jesuit, James Massola provided a state-of-play of the new phenomenon of “citizen journalism.” The roughly 100 million blogs now spooling out on the Internet have provided a voice for the masses and much of the content is high quality — if you can only find it. Massola claimed that the learning curve for D.I.Y. internet publication — blogs and their ilk — no longer have a discouraging learning curve due to new software packages.

On a cautionary note, he pointed out that misinformation is rife, so readers must be cautious. But there’s no avoiding it, he added, considering that a third of media is consumed online and that portion is growing.




About

This is the post-conference blog for the 5th World Conference of Science Journalists which took place in Melbourne, Australia from 16 to 20 April 2007.

Acknowledgments